Rosternomics
← Trade Database
January 12, 1990

WSNMIN

WSN won this trade +$4.8M surplus WSN won this trade +0.5 WAR
WSNWSN Dave Dombrowski net +$4.8M net +0.5
received +$0.0M+$0.0M ± $11M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 0.2 ± 1 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved WSN's 1990 odds 9% → 10% (+1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Jim Davins
+$0.3M+$0.3M± $11M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.2± 1 exp WARrealized 0.0
Unidentified minor-league throw-in — valued at the ~0.2 WAR base rate (most produce nothing)
MINMIN Andy MacPhail net −$4.8M net -0.5
received −$2.4M−$2.4M ± $0M expected surplus · −$4.8M realized received 0.0 ± 0 expected · -0.5 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved MIN's 1990 odds 4% → 3% (-0.4 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Jim DwyerOF·40y·L/L
−$2.1M−$2.1M± $0M exp surplusrealized −$4.8M 0.0± 0 exp WARrealized -0.5
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.4/yr over 1.5 season
Talent
0.87/yr blended
Horizon
0.0 control yr

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.