Rosternomics
← Trade Database
July 30, 2011

CLECOL

CLE won this trade +$51.2M surplus CLE won this trade +5.9 WAR
CLECLE Mark Shapiro net +$51.2M net +5.9
received +$137.6M+$137.6M ± $34M expected surplus · +$45.6M realized received 9.8 ± 4 expected · 5.5 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved CLE's 2011 odds 2% → 3% (+0.9 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Ubaldo JiménezP·27y·R/R
+$137.9M+$137.9M± $34M exp surplusrealized +$45.6M 9.8± 4 exp WARrealized 5.5
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 4.9/yr over 2.2 seasons
Talent
3.26/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs
COLCOL Daniel O'Dowd net −$51.2M net -5.9
received +$40.0M+$40.0M ± $58M expected surplus · −$5.6M realized received 10.1 ± 7 expected · -0.4 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved COL's 2011 odds 4% → 3% (-1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Drew PomeranzP·22y·R/L
+$20.3M+$20.3M± $45M exp surplusrealized +$6.4M 5.2± 6 exp WARrealized 1.4
Prior
#5 overall draft pick → 0.95/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.95/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Alex WhiteP·22y·R/R
+$16.3M+$16.3M± $17M exp surplusrealized −$4.0M 2.5± 2 exp WARrealized -0.5
Prior
Composite #47.0 prospect (Baseball America #47 (2011)) → 0.63/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.63/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs
Joe GardnerP·23y·R/R
+$2.3M+$2.3M± $24M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.3± 3 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#94 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs
Matt McBrideC/1B/OF·26y·R/R
+$1.3M+$1.3M± $21M exp surplusrealized −$8.0M 1.1± 3 exp WARrealized -1.3
Prior
#75 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs × 0.96 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.