Rosternomics
← Trade Database
March 30, 1986

MILOAK

OAK won this trade +$3.2M surplus MIL won this trade +0.4 WAR
MILMIL Harry Dalton net −$3.2M net +0.4
received +$0.0M+$0.0M ± $58M expected surplus · +$1.6M realized received 2.4 ± 7 expected · 2.1 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved MIL's 1986 odds 2% → 2% (-0.8 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Charlie O'BrienC·26y·R/R
+$3.8M+$3.8M± $24M exp surplusrealized +$6.4M 2.0± 3 exp WARrealized 2.6
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.0/yr over 0.1 season
Talent
0.37/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs × 0.98 age decline
Mike Fulmer
+$0.3M+$0.3M± $15M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.2± 2 exp WARrealized 0.0
Unidentified minor-league throw-in — valued at the ~0.2 WAR base rate (most produce nothing)
Pete Kendrick
+$0.3M+$0.3M± $15M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.2± 2 exp WARrealized 0.0
Unidentified minor-league throw-in — valued at the ~0.2 WAR base rate (most produce nothing)
Steve Kiefer3B·25y·R/R
−$4.5M−$4.5M± $48M exp surplusrealized −$4.8M 0.0± 6 exp WARrealized -0.5
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -2.9/yr over 0.3 season
Talent
-0.35/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
OAKOAK Sandy Alderson net +$3.2M net -0.4
received +$27.2M+$27.2M ± $22M expected surplus · +$4.8M realized received 3.7 ± 3 expected · 1.7 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved OAK's 1986 odds 6% → 9% (+2.7 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Moose HaasP·30y·R/R
+$26.9M+$26.9M± $22M exp surplusrealized +$4.8M 3.7± 3 exp WARrealized 1.7
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.3/yr over 0.9 season
Talent
1.11/yr blended
Horizon
4.4 control yrs × 0.76 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.