Rosternomics
← Trade Database
January 11, 2024

CHCLAD

unsettledToo soon to call — players still accruing.
CHCCHC Jed Hoyer net +$65.6M net +7.9
received −$3.2M−$3.2M ± $21M expected surplus · +$65.6M realized received 0.5 ± 3 expected · 7.9 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved CHC's 2024 odds 14% → 22% (+8.2 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Yency AlmonteP·30y·R/R
−$0.4M−$0.4M± $8M exp surplusrealized −$0.8M 0.2± 1 exp WARrealized 0.2
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.2/yr over 2.5 seasons
Talent
0.18/yr blended
Horizon
2.0 control yrs × 0.61 age decline
Michael Busch1B·26y·L/R
−$2.9M−$2.9M± $19M exp surplusrealized +$66.4M 0.3± 2 exp WARrealized 7.7
Prior
Composite #47.0 pedigree (Baseball America #43 (2024) / MLB Pipeline #51 (2024)) → 0.54/yr
Evidence
recent form -3.1/yr over 0.2 season
Talent
0.07/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs × 0.91 age decline
LADLAD Andrew Friedman net −$65.6M net -7.9
received +$4.8M+$4.8M ± $32M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 2.6 ± 4 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved LAD's 2024 odds 90% → 83% (-6.5 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Jackson FerrisP·20y·L/L
+$2.3M+$2.3M± $22M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.3± 3 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#47 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs
Zyhir HopeCF·19y·L/L
+$2.3M+$2.3M± $22M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.3± 3 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#326 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs
Fan verdict — who overpaid?

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.