Rosternomics
← Trade Database
March 14, 1998

TEXTOR

TEX won this trade +$12.0M surplus TEX won this trade +2.9 WAR
TEXTEX Douglas Melvin net +$12.0M net +2.9
received +$2.4M+$2.4M ± $18M expected surplus · +$12.8M realized received 0.9 ± 2 expected · 3.5 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved TEX's 1998 odds 69% → 72% (+3.5 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Tim CrabtreeP·28y·R/R
+$2.6M+$2.6M± $18M exp surplusrealized +$12.8M 0.9± 2 exp WARrealized 3.5
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.3/yr over 2.1 seasons
Talent
0.29/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs
TORTOR Gord Ash net −$12.0M net -2.9
received +$3.2M+$3.2M ± $22M expected surplus · +$0.8M realized received 1.7 ± 3 expected · 0.6 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved TOR's 1998 odds 49% → 45% (-4.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Kevin BrownC·25y·R/R
+$3.3M+$3.3M± $22M exp surplusrealized +$0.8M 1.7± 3 exp WARrealized 0.6
Prior
#56 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 3.9/yr over 0.0 season
Talent
0.34/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.