Rosternomics
← Trade Database
December 16, 2011

SDPCLE

SDP won this trade +$2.4M surplus SDP won this trade +0.5 WAR
SDPSDP Jed Hoyer net +$2.4M net +0.5
received +$1.6M+$1.6M ± $22M expected surplus · −$0.8M realized received 1.2 ± 3 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved SDP's 2012 odds 5% → 5% (+0.6 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Cory BurnsP·24y·R/R
+$1.8M+$1.8M± $22M exp surplusrealized −$0.8M 1.2± 3 exp WARrealized -0.0
Prior
#245 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
CLECLE Mark Shapiro net −$2.4M net -0.5
received +$4.8M+$4.8M ± $18M expected surplus · −$3.2M realized received 1.0 ± 2 expected · -0.5 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved CLE's 2012 odds 1% → 1% (-0.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Aaron CunninghamOF·26y·R/R
+$4.4M+$4.4M± $18M exp surplusrealized −$3.2M 1.0± 2 exp WARrealized -0.5
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.6/yr over 0.7 season
Talent
0.34/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.