Rosternomics
← Trade Database
February 4, 1999

CINNYM

CIN won this trade +$2.4M surplus CIN won this trade +0.2 WAR
CINCIN Jim Bowden net +$2.4M net +0.2
received +$1.6M+$1.6M ± $16M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 0.9 ± 2 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
receives — most valuable first
Ralph Milliard2B·25y·R/R
+$1.8M+$1.8M± $16M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.9± 2 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.3/yr over 0.2 season
Talent
0.22/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs
NYMNYM Steve Phillips net −$2.4M net -0.2
received +$1.6M+$1.6M ± $23M expected surplus · −$2.4M realized received 1.2 ± 3 expected · -0.2 realized WAR
receives — most valuable first
Mark CoreyP·24y·R/R
+$1.8M+$1.8M± $23M exp surplusrealized −$2.4M 1.2± 3 exp WARrealized -0.2
Prior
#111 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.