Rosternomics
← Trade Database
March 29, 1994

SDPANA

SDP won this trade +$7.2M surplus SDP won this trade +1.1 WAR
SDPSDP Randy Smith net +$7.2M net +1.1
received +$0.0M+$0.0M ± $30M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 0.7 ± 4 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved SDP's 1994 odds 2% → 2% (+0.7 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Hilly HathawayP·24y·L/L
−$0.1M−$0.1M± $30M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.7± 4 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#459 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.1/yr over 0.4 season
Talent
0.14/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs
ANAANA Whitey Herzog net −$7.2M net -1.1
received +$6.4M+$5.6M ± $14M expected surplus · −$7.2M realized received 1.6 ± 2 expected · -1.1 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved ANA's 1994 odds 1% → 1% (-0.4 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Harold Reynolds2B·33y·B/R
+$6.0M+$5.3M± $14M exp surplusrealized −$7.2M 1.6± 2 exp WARrealized -1.1
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.6/yr over 2.7 seasons
Talent
1.16/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.94 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.