Rosternomics
← Trade Database
November 27, 2019

TBRCIN

TBR won this trade +$0.0M surplus TBR won this trade +0.0 WAR
TBRTBR Erik Neander net +$0.0M net +0.0
received +$1.6M+$1.6M ± $18M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 0.9 ± 2 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
receives — most valuable first
Brian O'GradyOF·28y·L/R
+$1.5M+$1.5M± $18M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.9± 2 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#245 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.5/yr over 0.2 season
Talent
0.25/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs × 0.66 age decline
CINCIN Dick Williams net +$0.0M net +0.0
received +$0.0M+$0.0M ± $0M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 0.0 ± 0 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
receives — most valuable first
cash / PTBNL
+$0.0M+$0.0M± $0M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.0± 0 exp WARrealized 0.0
Cash or player to be named — no projection

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.