Rosternomics
← Exit to Trade Database
August 1, 2026

MINBAL

unsettledToo soon to call — players still accruing.
🗳 Trade VotingRate every deal of the season — biggest first. Your verdict vs. the model.
28 / 207table view →skip →
Fan verdict — who overpaid?
MINMIN Derek Falvey net +$4.8M net +0.6
received +$11.2M+$11.2M ± $11M expected surplus · +$4.8M realized received 1.4 ± 1 expected · 0.6 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved MIN's 2026 odds 2.2% → 2.4% (+0.2 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Dean KremerP·30y·R/R
+$11.1M+$11.1M± $11M exp surplusrealized +$4.8M 1.4± 1 exp WARrealized 0.6
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.1/yr over 2.2 seasons
Talent
1.50/yr blended
Horizon
2.0 control yrs × 0.48 age decline
BALBAL Mike Elias net −$4.8M net -0.6
received +$1.6M+$1.6M ± $20M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 1.1 ± 2 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
receives — most valuable first
Jhomnardo ReyesOF·18y·L/L
+$2.0M+$2.0M± $20M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.1± 2 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs × 0.84 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.