Rosternomics
← Trade Database
March 28, 1998

STLNYM

STL won this trade +$2.4M surplus STL won this trade +0.7 WAR
STLSTL Walt Jocketty net +$2.4M net +0.7
received −$2.4M−$2.4M ± $18M expected surplus · +$1.6M realized received 0.0 ± 2 expected · 0.8 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved STL's 1998 odds 38% → 47% (+8.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Juan AcevedoP·28y·R/R
−$2.2M−$2.2M± $18M exp surplusrealized +$1.6M 0.0± 2 exp WARrealized 0.8
Prior
#403 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.4/yr over 1.1 season
Talent
-0.08/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs
NYMNYM Steve Phillips net −$2.4M net -0.7
received +$8.8M+$8.8M ± $27M expected surplus · −$0.8M realized received 2.4 ± 3 expected · 0.1 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved NYM's 1998 odds 14% → 10% (-3.5 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Rigo BeltránP·28y·L/L
+$9.1M+$9.1M± $27M exp surplusrealized −$0.8M 2.4± 3 exp WARrealized 0.1
Prior
#675 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.0/yr over 1.0 season
Talent
0.57/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs × 0.85 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.