Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
March 22, 1996

SDPDET

SDP won this trade +$21.6M surplus SDP won this trade +3.6 WAR
SDPSDP Kevin Towers net +$21.6M net +3.6
received +$25.6M+$24.0M ± $93M expected surplus · +$5.6M realized received 7.4 ± 12 expected · 1.6 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved SDP's 1996 odds 36% → 47% (+11.8 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Cade GasparP·23y·R/R
+$14.4M+$12.8M± $62M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 3.5± 8 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#18 overall draft pick → 0.58/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.58/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs
Sean BergmanP·26y·R/R
+$11.2M+$11.2M± $42M exp surplusrealized +$6.4M 3.1± 5 exp WARrealized 1.6
Prior
#114 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.1/yr over 1.1 season
Talent
0.63/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs
Todd SteversonOF·25y·R/R
+$0.0M+$0.0M± $54M exp surplusrealized −$0.8M 0.8± 7 exp WARrealized -0.0
Prior
#25 overall draft pick → 0.42/yr
Evidence
recent form -1.6/yr over 0.2 season
Talent
0.14/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
DETDET Randy Smith net −$21.6M net -3.6
received +$3.2M+$3.2M ± $77M expected surplus · −$16.0M realized received 2.8 ± 10 expected · -2.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved DET's 1996 odds 0% → 0% (-0 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Raúl Casanova#60C·24y·B/R
+$9.6M+$9.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized −$6.4M 2.8± 7 exp WARrealized -0.8
Prior
BA #60 prospect (1995) → 0.51/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.51/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Richie LewisP·30y·R/R
−$2.4M−$2.4M± $25M exp surplusrealized +$0.8M 0.0± 3 exp WARrealized 0.3
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.4/yr over 2.1 seasons
Talent
-0.17/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs
Melvin NievesOF·25y·B/R
−$4.0M−$4.0M± $44M exp surplusrealized −$10.4M 0.0± 6 exp WARrealized -1.5
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.32/yr
Evidence
recent form -1.1/yr over 0.8 season
Talent
-0.22/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →