Rosternomics
← Trade Database
July 31, 2010

KCRATL

KCR won this trade +$8.0M surplus KCR won this trade +0.3 WAR
KCRKCR Dayton Moore net +$8.0M net +0.3
received +$6.4M+$6.4M ± $44M expected surplus · −$1.6M realized received 2.9 ± 6 expected · 0.9 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved KCR's 2010 odds 1% → 1% (-0.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Grégor BlancoOF·26y·L/L
+$6.2M+$6.2M± $32M exp surplusrealized +$1.6M 1.4± 4 exp WARrealized 0.4
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.6/yr over 0.8 season
Talent
0.36/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs
Tim CollinsP·20y·L/L
+$1.8M+$1.8M± $22M exp surplusrealized +$1.6M 1.2± 3 exp WARrealized 1.1
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Jesse ChavezP·26y·R/R
−$1.4M−$1.4M± $21M exp surplusrealized −$4.8M 0.3± 3 exp WARrealized -0.6
Prior
#1158 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.0/yr over 1.3 season
Talent
0.08/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs
ATLATL Frank Wren net −$8.0M net -0.3
received +$6.4M+$1.6M ± $24M expected surplus · −$9.6M realized received 2.8 ± 3 expected · 0.6 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved ATL's 2010 odds 31% → 34% (+3 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Rick AnkielOF·30y·L/L
+$13.3M+$13.3M± $23M exp surplusrealized −$2.4M 2.5± 3 exp WARrealized 0.4
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.3/yr over 1.5 season
Talent
0.80/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs × 0.77 age decline
Kyle FarnsworthP·34y·R/R
−$6.8M−$11.5M± $6M exp surplusrealized −$7.2M 0.3± 1 exp WARrealized 0.2
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.3/yr over 2.8 seasons
Talent
0.24/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.71 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.