Rosternomics
← Trade Database
December 23, 1990

CHWWSN

CHW won this trade +$88.8M surplus CHW won this trade +11.2 WAR
CHWCHW Larry Himes net +$88.8M net +11.2
received +$9.6M+$9.6M ± $34M expected surplus · +$84.0M realized received 5.6 ± 4 expected · 14.5 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved CHW's 1991 odds 41% → 39% (-2.6 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Tim RainesOF·31y·B/R
+$8.2M+$8.2M± $14M exp surplusrealized +$84.8M 4.3± 2 exp WARrealized 14.5
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 4.3/yr over 2.4 seasons
Talent
2.91/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.98 age decline
Jeff CarterP·26y·R/R
+$1.3M+$1.3M± $28M exp surplusrealized −$0.8M 1.1± 4 exp WARrealized -0.0
Prior
#485 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs × 0.94 age decline
Mario Brito
+$0.3M+$0.3M± $11M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.2± 1 exp WARrealized 0.0
Unidentified minor-league throw-in — valued at the ~0.2 WAR base rate (most produce nothing)
WSNWSN Dave Dombrowski net −$88.8M net -11.2
received +$16.0M+$9.6M ± $21M expected surplus · −$4.8M realized received 3.5 ± 3 expected · 3.3 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved WSN's 1991 odds 3% → 4% (+0.4 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Iván CalderónOF·29y·R/R
+$14.0M+$14.0M± $15M exp surplusrealized +$4.0M 3.0± 2 exp WARrealized 3.7
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.2/yr over 2.2 seasons
Talent
1.49/yr blended
Horizon
2.0 control yrs
Barry JonesP·28y·R/R
+$1.8M−$4.2M± $14M exp surplusrealized −$8.8M 0.5± 2 exp WARrealized -0.4
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.4/yr over 2.3 seasons
Talent
0.34/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.