Rosternomics
← Trade Database
April 2, 2009

ARIDET

ARI won this trade +$0.0M surplus ARI won this trade +0 WAR
ARIARI Josh Byrnes net +$0.0M net +0.0
received +$2.4M+$2.4M ± $24M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 1.3 ± 3 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
receives — most valuable first
James SkeltonC·23y·L/R
+$2.3M+$2.3M± $24M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.3± 3 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#403 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs
DETDET Dave Dombrowski net +$0.0M net +0.0
received +$10.4M+$10.4M ± $22M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 1.8 ± 3 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
receives — most valuable first
Brooks BrownP·24y·L/R
+$10.2M+$10.2M± $22M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.8± 3 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#34 overall draft pick → 0.32/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.32/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.