Rosternomics
← Trade Database
May 26, 2021

NYMMIL

NYM won this trade +$2.4M surplus NYM won this trade +0.4 WAR
NYMNYM Sandy Alderson net +$2.4M net +0.4
received +$0.8M+$0.8M ± $23M expected surplus · +$2.4M realized received 0.9 ± 3 expected · 0.4 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved NYM's 2021 odds 24% → 26% (+1.8 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Billy McKinneyOF·26y·L/L
+$1.0M+$1.0M± $23M exp surplusrealized +$2.4M 0.9± 3 exp WARrealized 0.4
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.34/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.2/yr over 0.5 season
Talent
0.18/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs
MILMIL David Stearns net −$2.4M net -0.4
received +$0.0M+$0.0M ± $6M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 0.2 ± 1 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved MIL's 2021 odds 53% → 50% (-2.5 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Pedro Quintana
+$0.3M+$0.3M± $6M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.2± 1 exp WARrealized 0.0
Unidentified minor-league throw-in — valued at the ~0.2 WAR base rate (most produce nothing)

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.