Rosternomics
← Trade Database
July 31, 1998

CHCMIA

MIA won this trade +$1.6M surplus CHC won this trade +0.5 WAR
CHCCHC Ed Lynch net −$1.6M net +0.5
received +$6.4M+$6.4M ± $39M expected surplus · −$2.4M realized received 2.6 ± 5 expected · 0.9 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved CHC's 1998 odds 19% → 24% (+4.9 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Félix HerediaP·23y·L/L
+$3.9M+$3.9M± $30M exp surplusrealized −$2.4M 1.3± 4 exp WARrealized 0.9
Prior
Composite #43.0 pedigree (Baseball America #43 (1997)) — fell off 1 list since, regressed → 0.30/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.3/yr over 1.5 season
Talent
0.32/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs
Steve HoffP·20y·L/L
+$2.3M+$2.3M± $26M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.3± 3 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#397 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs
MIAMIA Dave Dombrowski net +$1.6M net -0.5
received +$71.2M+$71.2M ± $72M expected surplus · −$0.8M realized received 14.6 ± 9 expected · 0.4 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved MIA's 1998 odds 0% → 0% (-0 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Kevin Orie3B·25y·R/R
+$55.8M+$55.8M± $55M exp surplusrealized +$4.0M 9.8± 7 exp WARrealized 1.2
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.29/yr
Evidence
recent form 3.0/yr over 0.8 season
Talent
1.95/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs
Todd NoelP·19y·R/R
+$13.4M+$13.4M± $39M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 3.6± 5 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#17 overall draft pick → 0.60/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.60/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs
Justin SpeierP·24y·R/R
+$1.8M+$1.8M± $24M exp surplusrealized −$4.8M 1.2± 3 exp WARrealized -0.8
Prior
#1451 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.