Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
July 23, 1998

CLESFG

CLE won this trade +$7.2M surplus CLE won this trade +1.9 WAR
CLECLE John Hart net +$7.2M net +1.9
received −$0.8M−$0.8M ± $55M expected surplus · −$14.4M realized received 2.4 ± 7 expected · 1.2 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved CLE's 1998 odds 50% → 54% (+4.3 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Jacob CruzOF·25y·L/L
+$6.4M+$6.4M± $54M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 2.2± 7 exp WARrealized 0.5
Prior
#32 overall draft pick → 0.31/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.8/yr over 0.2 season
Talent
0.40/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Steve ReedP·33y·R/R
−$7.2M−$7.2M± $12M exp surplusrealized −$14.4M 0.2± 2 exp WARrealized 0.7
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.2/yr over 2.6 seasons
Talent
0.20/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.68 age decline
SFGSFG Brian Sabean net −$7.2M net -1.9
received −$2.4M−$14.4M ± $38M expected surplus · −$21.6M realized received 2.2 ± 5 expected · -0.7 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved SFG's 1998 odds 64% → 60% (-4 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
José MesaP·32y·R/R
+$0.8M−$8.8M± $14M exp surplusrealized −$4.8M 1.5± 2 exp WARrealized 0.4
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.5/yr over 2.7 seasons
Talent
1.08/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.95 age decline
Shawon DunstonSS·35y·R/R
+$0.0M−$2.4M± $14M exp surplusrealized −$13.6M 0.7± 2 exp WARrealized -0.7
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.7/yr over 2.0 seasons
Talent
0.54/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.82 age decline
Alvin MormanP·29y·L/L
−$3.2M−$3.2M± $32M exp surplusrealized −$3.2M 0.0± 4 exp WARrealized -0.4
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.5/yr over 1.6 season
Talent
-0.19/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →