Rosternomics
← Trade Database
February 18, 1994

NYMDET

DET won this trade +$0.8M surplus NYM won this trade +0.0 WAR
NYMNYM Joe McIlvaine net −$0.8M net +0.0
received +$1.6M+$1.6M ± $29M expected surplus · −$0.8M realized received 1.2 ± 4 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
receives — most valuable first
Kevin Morgan3B·24y·R/R
+$1.8M+$1.8M± $29M exp surplusrealized −$0.8M 1.2± 4 exp WARrealized -0.0
Prior
#790 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
DETDET Jerry Walker net +$0.8M net +0.0
received +$0.8M+$0.8M ± $30M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 1.0 ± 4 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
receives — most valuable first
Joe Dellicarri2B·27y·R/R
+$0.7M+$0.7M± $30M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.0± 4 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#993 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs × 0.76 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.