Rosternomics
← Trade Database
January 8, 2001 · 3-team trade

OAKTBRKCR

OAK won this trade +$211.2M surplus OAK won this trade +26.2 WAR
OAKOAK Billy Beane net +$211.2M net +26.2
received +$57.6M+$38.4M ± $34M expected surplus · +$191.2M realized received 7.0 ± 4 expected · 30.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved OAK's 2001 odds 84% → 92% (+8.3 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Johnny DamonOF·27y·L/L
+$51.5M+$32.7M± $20M exp surplusrealized −$1.6M 4.6± 2 exp WARrealized 1.9
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.22/yr
Evidence
recent form 3.2/yr over 2.5 seasons
Talent
3.06/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr
Cory LidleP·29y·R/R
+$4.1M+$4.1M± $18M exp surplusrealized +$56.0M 1.2± 2 exp WARrealized 6.2
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.9/yr over 1.4 season
Talent
0.58/yr blended
Horizon
2.0 control yrs
Mark Ellis2B·24y·R/R
+$1.8M+$1.8M± $21M exp surplusrealized +$136.8M 1.2± 3 exp WARrealized 21.9
Prior
#271 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
TBRTBR Chuck Lamar net −$53.6M net -5.2
received +$16.8M+$16.8M ± $33M expected surplus · −$16.8M realized received 3.3 ± 4 expected · 2.2 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved TBR's 2001 odds 0% → 0% (-0.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Ben GrieveOF·25y·L/R
+$16.8M+$16.8M± $33M exp surplusrealized −$16.8M 3.3± 4 exp WARrealized 2.2
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.37/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.5/yr over 2.1 seasons
Talent
1.09/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs
KCRKCR Allard Baird net −$157.6M net -21.0
received −$4.8M−$4.8M ± $33M expected surplus · −$22.4M realized received 2.4 ± 4 expected · 2.8 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved KCR's 2001 odds 1% → 1% (-0.2 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Ángel BerroaSS·23y·R/R
+$1.8M+$1.8M± $21M exp surplusrealized −$1.6M 1.2± 3 exp WARrealized 1.6
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
A. J. HinchC·27y·R/R
−$1.7M−$1.7M± $22M exp surplusrealized −$1.6M 0.1± 3 exp WARrealized -0.0
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.2/yr over 0.8 season
Talent
0.03/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs
Roberto HernándezP·36y·R/R
−$4.9M−$4.9M± $14M exp surplusrealized −$19.2M 1.1± 2 exp WARrealized 1.2
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.27/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.4/yr over 2.8 seasons
Talent
1.03/yr blended
Horizon
1.1 control yr × 0.98 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.