Rosternomics
← Trade Database
December 13, 2001

PITCHW

PIT won this trade +$84.0M surplus PIT won this trade +8.7 WAR
PITPIT Roy Smith net +$84.0M net +8.7
received +$46.4M+$46.4M ± $50M expected surplus · +$86.4M realized received 7.8 ± 6 expected · 10.1 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved PIT's 2002 odds 1% → 1% (+0.2 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Kip WellsP·25y·R/R
+$26.3M+$26.3M± $42M exp surplusrealized +$74.4M 3.9± 5 exp WARrealized 7.6
Prior
Composite #14.0 pedigree (Baseball America #14 (2000)) — fell off 2 lists since, regressed → 0.34/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.5/yr over 1.5 season
Talent
0.98/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs
Josh FoggP·25y·R/R
+$14.8M+$14.8M± $17M exp surplusrealized +$16.0M 2.4± 2 exp WARrealized 2.8
Prior
#89 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.2/yr over 0.4 season
Talent
0.44/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Sean LoweP·31y·R/R
+$5.6M+$5.6M± $22M exp surplusrealized −$4.0M 1.5± 3 exp WARrealized -0.3
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.36/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.8/yr over 2.1 seasons
Talent
0.67/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs × 0.76 age decline
CHWCHW Kenny Williams net −$84.0M net -8.7
received +$29.6M+$27.2M ± $26M expected surplus · +$2.4M realized received 4.0 ± 3 expected · 1.4 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved CHW's 2002 odds 29% → 23% (-5.8 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Todd RitchieP·30y·R/R
+$27.6M+$24.8M± $16M exp surplusrealized +$2.4M 2.7± 2 exp WARrealized 1.4
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.40/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.6/yr over 2.4 seasons
Talent
1.88/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.98 age decline
Lee EvansC·24y·S/R
+$2.3M+$2.3M± $21M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.3± 3 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#96 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.