Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
July 22, 2013

CHCTEX

CHC won this trade +$12.0M surplus CHC won this trade +3.4 WAR
CHCCHC Jed Hoyer net +$12.0M net +3.4
received +$12.8M+$12.8M ± $98M expected surplus · +$12.0M realized received 5.4 ± 12 expected · 4.6 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved CHC's 2013 odds 3% → 2% (-0.6 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Mike Olt3B·25y·R/R
+$5.6M+$5.6M± $56M exp surplusrealized −$3.2M 2.0± 7 exp WARrealized -0.5
Prior
BA #22 pedigree (2013) → 0.84/yr
Evidence
recent form -5.0/yr over 0.1 season
Talent
0.36/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Justin GrimmP·25y·R/R
+$4.8M+$4.8M± $52M exp surplusrealized +$2.4M 1.8± 6 exp WARrealized 1.6
Prior
#166 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.8/yr over 0.3 season
Talent
0.33/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Carl EdwardsP·22y·R/R
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized +$9.6M 1.2± 7 exp WARrealized 2.6
Prior
#1464 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Neil RamírezP·24y·R/R
+$0.8M+$0.8M± $24M exp surplusrealized +$3.2M 0.4± 3 exp WARrealized 0.9
Prior
#44 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
2.0 control yrs
TEXTEX Jon Daniels net −$12.0M net -3.4
received +$8.0M+$8.0M ± $12M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 1.6 ± 2 expected · 1.2 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved TEX's 2013 odds 41% → 46% (+5.3 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Matt GarzaP·30y·R/R
+$8.0M+$8.0M± $12M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.6± 2 exp WARrealized 1.2
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.27/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.2/yr over 2.7 seasons
Talent
1.59/yr blended
Horizon
1.0 control yr

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →