Rosternomics
Log in Sign up 𝕏
← Trade Database
April 1, 1985

PHI⇄TOR

PHI won this trade +$6.4M surplus PHI won this trade +0.9 WAR
PHIPHI Bill Giles net +$6.4M net +0.9
received +$4.0M+$4.0M ± $39M expected surplus · −$0.8M realized received 2.6 ± 5 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved PHI's 1985 odds 2% → 3% (+0.5 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
José Escobar2B/SS·24y·R/R
+$1.8M+$1.8M± $26M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.2± 3 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Dave ShipanoffP·25y·R/R
+$1.8M+$1.8M± $26M exp surplusrealized −$0.8M 1.2± 3 exp WARrealized -0.0
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Ken Kinnard
+$0.3M+$0.3M± $15M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.2± 2 exp WARrealized 0.0
Unidentified minor-league throw-in — valued at the ~0.2 WAR base rate (most produce nothing)
TORTOR Pat Gillick net −$6.4M net -0.9
received −$1.6M−$1.6M ± $18M expected surplus · −$7.2M realized received 0.3 ± 2 expected · -0.9 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved TOR's 1985 odds 72% → 67% (-4.5 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Len Matuszek1B·30y·L/R
−$1.4M−$1.4M± $18M exp surplusrealized −$7.2M 0.3± 2 exp WARrealized -0.9
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
4.4 control yrs × 0.35 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Rosternomics — front-office performance, roster value, and transaction history. Follow @rosternomics on X.
Decision-maker records extend to 1933; resource-controlled WAR and payroll metrics cover 1985–2026. Data sources include FanGraphs, Baseball-Reference, the Chadwick Bureau register, the Lahman Database, prospect rankings from Baseball America, MLB Pipeline, and FanGraphs, and public payroll records. Transaction and trade data was obtained free of charge from and is copyrighted by Retrosheet. Executive birth/death data via Wikidata (CC0).
Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · © 2026 Rosternomics