Rosternomics
← Trade Database
January 18, 1996

NYMANA

NYM won this trade +$0.0M surplus NYM won this trade +0 WAR
NYMNYM Joe McIlvaine net +$0.0M net +0.0
received −$1.6M−$1.6M ± $9M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 0.0 ± 1 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
receives — most valuable first
Kevin FloraOF·27y·R/R
−$1.4M−$1.4M± $9M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.0± 1 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#57 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -3.2/yr over 0.2 season
Talent
-0.23/yr blended
Horizon
2.0 control yrs
ANAANA Bill Bavasi net +$0.0M net +0.0
received −$3.2M−$3.2M ± $24M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 0.2 ± 3 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
receives — most valuable first
Aaron LedesmaSS·25y·R/R
−$3.4M−$3.4M± $24M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.2± 3 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#57 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -1.5/yr over 0.1 season
Talent
0.03/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.