Rosternomics
← Trade Database
April 26, 2025

CHCCHW

unsettledToo soon to call — players still accruing.
CHCCHC Jed Hoyer net +$1.6M net +0.1
received +$0.0M+$0.0M ± $0M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 0.0 ± 0 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved CHC's 2025 odds 68% → 68% (+0.5 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
cash / PTBNL
+$0.0M+$0.0M± $0M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.0± 0 exp WARrealized 0.0
Cash or player to be named — no projection
CHWCHW Chris Getz net −$1.6M net -0.1
received +$1.6M+$1.6M ± $21M expected surplus · −$1.6M realized received 1.2 ± 3 expected · -0.1 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved CHW's 2025 odds 0% → 0% (-0 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Gage Workman3B·25y·L/R
+$1.8M+$1.8M± $21M exp surplusrealized −$1.6M 1.2± 3 exp WARrealized -0.1
Prior
#102 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Fan verdict — who overpaid?

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.