Rosternomics
← Trade Database
July 31, 2025

TBRCHW

unsettledToo soon to call — players still accruing.
TBRTBR Erik Neander net +$5.6M net +0.9
received +$1.6M+$1.6M ± $7M expected surplus · +$2.4M realized received 0.7 ± 1 expected · 0.5 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved TBR's 2025 odds 6% → 8% (+1.2 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Adrian HouserP·32y·R/R
+$2.0M+$2.0M± $7M exp surplusrealized +$2.4M 0.7± 1 exp WARrealized 0.5
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.0/yr over 2.0 seasons
Talent
0.72/yr blended
Horizon
1.0 control yr
CHWCHW Chris Getz net −$5.6M net -0.9
received +$4.0M+$4.0M ± $37M expected surplus · −$3.2M realized received 3.3 ± 5 expected · -0.4 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved CHW's 2025 odds 0% → 0% (-0.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Ben PeoplesP·24y·L/R
+$2.3M+$2.3M± $22M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.3± 3 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#668 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs
Duncan DavittP·25y·R/R
+$1.8M+$1.8M± $21M exp surplusrealized −$0.8M 1.2± 3 exp WARrealized -0.1
Prior
#554 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Curtis Mead1B/3B·24y·R/R
−$0.3M−$0.3M± $20M exp surplusrealized −$2.4M 0.8± 2 exp WARrealized -0.3
Prior
Composite #60.0 pedigree (Baseball America #65 (2024) / MLB Pipeline #55 (2024)) — fell off 1 list since, regressed → 0.26/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.2/yr over 0.4 season
Talent
0.15/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Fan verdict — who overpaid?

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.