Rosternomics
← Trade Database
August 1, 2023

BOSMIL

unsettledToo soon to call — players still accruing.
BOSBOS Chaim Bloom net −$2.4M net +0.2
received +$30.4M+$30.4M ± $31M expected surplus · −$2.4M realized received 5.8 ± 4 expected · 0.2 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved BOS's 2023 odds 4% → 4% (+0.2 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Luis Urías2B/3B·26y·R/R
+$30.2M+$30.2M± $31M exp surplusrealized −$2.4M 5.8± 4 exp WARrealized 0.2
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.4/yr over 1.7 season
Talent
1.93/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs
MILMIL Matt Arnold net +$2.4M net -0.2
received +$1.6M+$1.6M ± $20M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 1.2 ± 2 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved MIL's 2023 odds 17% → 17% (-0.7 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Bradley BlalockP·22y·R/R
+$1.8M+$1.8M± $20M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.2± 2 exp WARrealized -0.0
Prior
#977 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Fan verdict — who overpaid?

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.