Rosternomics
← Trade Database
January 27, 2015

BOSTEX

BOS won this trade +$2.4M surplus BOS won this trade +1.3 WAR
BOSBOS Dave Dombrowski net +$2.4M net +1.3
received +$4.8M+$4.8M ± $29M expected surplus · +$0.8M realized received 1.5 ± 4 expected · 1.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved BOS's 2015 odds 6% → 6% (+0.2 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Robbie RossP·26y·L/L
+$4.9M+$4.9M± $29M exp surplusrealized +$0.8M 1.5± 4 exp WARrealized 1.0
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.5/yr over 2.0 seasons
Talent
0.37/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs
TEXTEX Jon Daniels net −$2.4M net -1.3
received −$4.8M−$4.8M ± $30M expected surplus · −$1.6M realized received 0.0 ± 4 expected · -0.3 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved TEX's 2015 odds 12% → 12% (-0.3 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Anthony RanaudoP·25y·R/R
−$4.5M−$4.5M± $30M exp surplusrealized −$1.6M 0.0± 4 exp WARrealized -0.3
Prior
#39 overall draft pick → 0.23/yr
Evidence
recent form -3.5/yr over 0.2 season
Talent
-0.38/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.