Rosternomics
← Trade Database
December 18, 2004

OAKSTL

OAK won this trade +$239.2M surplus OAK won this trade +20.8 WAR
OAKOAK Billy Beane net +$239.2M net +20.8
received +$28.8M+$28.8M ± $50M expected surplus · +$248.0M realized received 6.8 ± 6 expected · 22.4 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved OAK's 2005 odds 34% → 49% (+15.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Daric Barton1B·19y·L/R
+$15.0M+$15.0M± $36M exp surplusrealized +$35.2M 4.0± 4 exp WARrealized 7.7
Prior
Composite #32.0 prospect (Baseball America #32 (2005)) → 0.72/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.72/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Dan HarenP·24y·R/R
+$12.1M+$12.1M± $32M exp surplusrealized +$207.2M 1.9± 4 exp WARrealized 12.2
Prior
#72 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.9/yr over 0.8 season
Talent
0.47/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs
Kiko CaleroP·30y·R/R
+$1.8M+$1.8M± $13M exp surplusrealized +$5.6M 0.9± 2 exp WARrealized 2.5
Prior
#799 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.6/yr over 1.6 season
Talent
0.45/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs × 0.51 age decline
STLSTL Walt Jocketty net −$239.2M net -20.8
received +$38.4M+$38.4M ± $19M expected surplus · +$8.8M realized received 3.9 ± 2 expected · 1.6 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved STL's 2005 odds 71% → 57% (-14.2 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Mark MulderP·27y·L/L
+$38.4M+$38.4M± $19M exp surplusrealized +$8.8M 3.9± 2 exp WARrealized 1.6
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.58/yr
Evidence
recent form 3.6/yr over 2.4 seasons
Talent
2.60/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.