Rosternomics
← Trade Database
January 9, 1996

STLOAK

STL won this trade +$116.0M surplus STL won this trade +12.1 WAR
STLSTL Walt Jocketty net +$116.0M net +12.1
received +$1.6M+$1.6M ± $22M expected surplus · +$103.2M realized received 3.1 ± 3 expected · 10.1 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved STL's 1996 odds 11% → 25% (+14.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Todd StottlemyreP·31y·L/R
+$1.3M+$1.3M± $22M exp surplusrealized +$103.2M 3.1± 3 exp WARrealized 10.1
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 3.0/yr over 2.7 seasons
Talent
2.12/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.98 age decline
OAKOAK Sandy Alderson net −$116.0M net -12.1
received +$17.6M+$17.6M ± $54M expected surplus · −$12.8M realized received 6.3 ± 7 expected · -2.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved OAK's 1996 odds 8% → 3% (-4.8 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Allen BattleOF·27y·R/R
+$8.9M+$8.9M± $22M exp surplusrealized −$6.4M 2.0± 3 exp WARrealized -1.2
Prior
#259 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.0/yr over 0.4 season
Talent
0.41/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs × 0.90 age decline
Bret Wagner#84P·23y·L/L
+$5.4M+$5.4M± $30M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.9± 4 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#19 overall draft pick → 0.31/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.31/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs
Carl DaleP·23y·R/R
+$1.8M+$1.8M± $27M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.2± 3 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#53 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Jay WitasickP·23y·R/R
+$1.8M+$1.8M± $27M exp surplusrealized −$6.4M 1.2± 3 exp WARrealized -0.8
Prior
#58 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.