Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
March 25, 1997

CLEATL

ATL won this trade +$40.8M surplus CLE won this trade +6.9 WAR
CLECLE John Hart net −$40.8M net +6.9
received +$13.6M−$6.4M ± $22M expected surplus · +$7.2M realized received 8.7 ± 3 expected · 13.1 realized WAR
receives — most valuable first
Marquis GrissomOF·30y·R/R
+$19.2M−$0.8M± $15M exp surplusrealized −$5.6M 4.0± 2 exp WARrealized 2.0
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 3.9/yr over 2.5 seasons
Talent
2.73/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.99 age decline
David JusticeOF·31y·L/L
−$5.6M−$5.6M± $16M exp surplusrealized +$12.8M 4.7± 2 exp WARrealized 11.1
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 5.3/yr over 1.7 season
Talent
3.20/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.99 age decline
ATLATL John Schuerholz net +$40.8M net -6.9
received +$49.6M+$20.0M ± $37M expected surplus · +$48.0M realized received 5.5 ± 5 expected · 6.2 realized WAR
receives — most valuable first
Kenny LoftonOF·30y·L/L
+$52.8M+$23.2M± $15M exp surplusrealized +$45.6M 5.5± 2 exp WARrealized 5.2
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 5.6/yr over 2.3 seasons
Talent
3.73/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.99 age decline
Alan EmbreeP·27y·L/L
−$3.2M−$3.2M± $34M exp surplusrealized +$2.4M 0.0± 4 exp WARrealized 1.0
Prior
#123 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.4/yr over 1.3 season
Talent
-0.09/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →