Rosternomics
← Trade Database
December 11, 1985

CINPHI

CIN won this trade +$29.6M surplus CIN won this trade +1.3 WAR
CINCIN Bill Bergesch net +$29.6M net +1.3
received +$26.4M+$26.4M ± $43M expected surplus · +$28.0M realized received 4.5 ± 5 expected · 2.9 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved CIN's 1986 odds 11% → 12% (+1.3 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
John DennyP·33y·R/R
+$24.6M+$24.6M± $35M exp surplusrealized +$28.8M 3.3± 4 exp WARrealized 2.9
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.8/yr over 1.0 season
Talent
1.39/yr blended
Horizon
2.8 control yrs × 0.87 age decline
Jeff GrayP·23y·R/R
+$1.8M+$1.8M± $26M exp surplusrealized −$0.8M 1.2± 3 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
PHIPHI Bill Giles net −$29.6M net -1.3
received +$27.2M+$27.2M ± $30M expected surplus · −$1.6M realized received 5.3 ± 4 expected · 1.6 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved PHI's 1986 odds 11% → 10% (-1.2 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Gary RedusOF·29y·R/R
+$29.0M+$29.0M± $28M exp surplusrealized +$14.4M 5.2± 4 exp WARrealized 2.0
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.9/yr over 0.7 season
Talent
1.19/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs × 0.88 age decline
Tom HumeP·33y·R/R
−$1.7M−$1.7M± $10M exp surplusrealized −$16.0M 0.1± 1 exp WARrealized -0.4
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.1/yr over 1.0 season
Talent
0.06/yr blended
Horizon
2.8 control yrs × 0.36 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.