Rosternomics
← Trade Database
July 11, 2026

PITCHW

unsettledToo soon to call — players still accruing.
PITPIT Ben Cherington net +$0.8M net +0.1
received +$8.8M+$8.8M ± $25M expected surplus · +$0.8M realized received 3.7 ± 3 expected · 0.1 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved PIT's 2026 odds 25.1% → 25.4% (+0.3 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Jacob GonzalezSS·24y·L/R
+$9.4M+$9.4M± $23M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 3.2± 3 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#15 overall draft pick → 0.63/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.63/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs × 0.86 age decline
Brandon EisertP·28y·L/L
−$0.4M−$0.4M± $8M exp surplusrealized +$0.8M 0.5± 1 exp WARrealized 0.1
Prior
#537 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.0/yr over 1.1 season
Talent
0.22/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs × 0.43 age decline
CHWCHW Chris Getz net −$0.8M net -0.1
received +$1.6M+$1.6M ± $20M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 1.1 ± 2 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
receives — most valuable first
Jaden WoodsP·24y·L/L
+$1.9M+$1.9M± $20M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.1± 2 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#197 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs × 0.86 age decline
Fan verdict — who overpaid?

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.