Rosternomics
← Trade Database
November 25, 1985

TEXCHW

TEX won this trade +$80.8M surplus TEX won this trade +11.7 WAR
TEXTEX Tom Grieve net +$80.8M net +11.7
received +$12.8M+$12.8M ± $63M expected surplus · +$80.8M realized received 5.3 ± 8 expected · 13.2 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved TEX's 1986 odds 3% → 12% (+8.9 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Scott Fletcher2B/SS·27y·R/R
+$7.9M+$7.9M± $30M exp surplusrealized +$60.8M 2.6± 4 exp WARrealized 10.4
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.1/yr over 0.8 season
Talent
0.55/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs × 0.96 age decline
José Mota2B·21y·B/R
+$5.4M+$5.4M± $26M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.9± 3 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#33 overall draft pick → 0.34/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.34/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Ed CorreaP·20y·R/R
−$0.3M−$0.3M± $50M exp surplusrealized +$20.0M 0.8± 6 exp WARrealized 2.8
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.4/yr over 0.2 season
Talent
0.14/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
CHWCHW Roland Hemond net −$80.8M net -11.7
received +$17.6M+$17.6M ± $30M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 4.7 ± 4 expected · 1.5 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved CHW's 1986 odds 10% → 3% (-7.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Dave SchmidtP·29y·R/R
+$9.1M+$9.1M± $22M exp surplusrealized −$2.4M 2.4± 3 exp WARrealized 0.9
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.2/yr over 1.0 season
Talent
0.65/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs × 0.73 age decline
Wayne Tolleson2B/SS·30y·B/R
+$8.3M+$8.3M± $21M exp surplusrealized +$2.4M 2.3± 3 exp WARrealized 0.6
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.6/yr over 0.8 season
Talent
0.76/yr blended
Horizon
4.4 control yrs × 0.70 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.