Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
July 31, 2015

TEXPHI

PHI won this trade +$71.2M surplus TEX won this trade +0.6 WAR
TEXTEX Jon Daniels net −$71.2M net +0.6
received +$32.0M+$32.0M ± $32M expected surplus · −$33.6M realized received 5.9 ± 4 expected · 8.7 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved TEX's 2015 odds 10% → 12% (+1.6 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Cole HamelsP·32y·L/L
+$22.4M+$22.4M± $12M exp surplusrealized −$35.2M 3.4± 2 exp WARrealized 7.0
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.27/yr
Evidence
recent form 4.8/yr over 2.8 seasons
Talent
3.40/yr blended
Horizon
1.0 control yr
Jake DiekmanP·28y·R/L
+$9.6M+$9.6M± $30M exp surplusrealized +$1.6M 2.5± 4 exp WARrealized 1.7
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.9/yr over 2.1 seasons
Talent
0.66/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs × 0.95 age decline
PHIPHI Scott Proefrock net +$71.2M net -0.6
received +$38.4M+$26.4M ± $130M expected surplus · +$37.6M realized received 12.1 ± 16 expected · 8.1 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved PHI's 2015 odds 1% → 1% (-0.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Jake Thompson#43P·21y·R/R
+$13.6M+$13.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized −$2.4M 3.7± 7 exp WARrealized -0.4
Prior
BA #43 prospect (2015) → 0.67/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.67/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Jorge Alfaro#67C·22y·R/R
+$8.8M+$8.8M± $58M exp surplusrealized +$14.4M 2.6± 7 exp WARrealized 2.9
Prior
BA #67 prospect (2015) → 0.47/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.47/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Nick Williams#97OF·22y·L/L
+$7.2M+$7.2M± $58M exp surplusrealized −$2.4M 2.3± 7 exp WARrealized -0.3
Prior
BA #97 prospect (2014) → 0.42/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.42/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Matt HarrisonP·30y·L/L
+$5.6M−$6.4M± $12M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.1± 2 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.9/yr over 1.4 season
Talent
1.10/yr blended
Horizon
1.0 control yr
Alec AsherP·24y·R/R
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized +$0.8M 1.2± 7 exp WARrealized 0.2
Prior
#156 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Jerad EickhoffP·25y·R/R
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized +$27.2M 1.2± 7 exp WARrealized 5.7
Prior
#474 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →