Rosternomics
← Trade Database
November 10, 2006

DETNYY

NYY won this trade +$26.4M surplus DET won this trade +3.0 WAR
DETDET Dave Dombrowski net −$26.4M net +3.0
received −$22.4M−$22.4M ± $0M expected surplus · −$30.4M realized received 0.0 ± 0 expected · 2.7 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved DET's 2007 odds 35% → 52% (+16.8 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Gary SheffieldOF·38y·R/R
−$22.2M−$22.2M± $0M exp surplusrealized −$30.4M 0.0± 0 exp WARrealized 2.7
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.24/yr
Evidence
recent form 3.8/yr over 2.1 seasons
Talent
2.48/yr blended
Horizon
0.0 control yr
NYYNYY Brian Cashman net +$26.4M net -3.0
received +$23.2M+$23.2M ± $38M expected surplus · −$4.0M realized received 5.4 ± 5 expected · -0.3 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved NYY's 2007 odds 89% → 80% (-8.9 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Humberto SánchezP·24y·R/R
+$19.3M+$19.3M± $22M exp surplusrealized −$0.8M 3.0± 3 exp WARrealized -0.0
Prior
Composite #57.0 prospect (Baseball America #57 (2007)) → 0.54/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.54/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Anthony ClaggettP·22y·B/R
+$1.8M+$1.8M± $22M exp surplusrealized −$1.6M 1.2± 3 exp WARrealized -0.2
Prior
#330 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Kevin WhelanP·23y·R/R
+$1.8M+$1.8M± $22M exp surplusrealized −$1.6M 1.2± 3 exp WARrealized -0.1
Prior
#120 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.