Rosternomics
← Trade Database
July 31, 2025

LADTBR

unsettledToo soon to call — players still accruing.
LADLAD Andrew Friedman net −$1.6M net +0.1
received +$8.8M+$8.8M ± $35M expected surplus · −$2.4M realized received 4.6 ± 4 expected · 0.1 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved LAD's 2025 odds 84% → 86% (+1.8 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Ben RortvedtC·27y·L/R
+$5.1M+$5.1M± $18M exp surplusrealized −$2.4M 2.1± 2 exp WARrealized -0.0
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.3/yr over 1.1 season
Talent
0.71/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs
Adam SerwinowskiP·21y·L/L
+$2.3M+$2.3M± $22M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.3± 3 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#453 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs
Paul GervaseP·25y·R/R
+$1.8M+$1.8M± $21M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.2± 3 exp WARrealized 0.1
Prior
#359 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
TBRTBR Erik Neander net +$1.6M net -0.1
received +$0.0M+$0.0M ± $15M expected surplus · −$0.8M realized received 1.0 ± 2 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved TBR's 2025 odds 9% → 8% (-1.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Hunter FeducciaC·28y·L/R
−$0.3M−$0.3M± $15M exp surplusrealized −$0.8M 1.0± 2 exp WARrealized -0.0
Prior
#374 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.4/yr over 0.0 season
Talent
0.27/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs × 0.69 age decline
Fan verdict — who overpaid?

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.