Rosternomics
← Exit to Trade Database
July 26, 2026

WSNBOS

unsettledToo soon to call — players still accruing.
🗳 Trade VotingRate every deal of the season — biggest first. Your verdict vs. the model.
11 / 207table view →skip →
Fan verdict — who overpaid?
WSNWSN Paul Toboni net +$0.0M net +0.0
received +$34.4M+$34.4M ± $20M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 4.7 ± 2 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
receives — most valuable first
Connelly EarlyP·24y·L/L
+$34.6M+$34.6M± $20M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 4.7± 2 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#151 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 8.2/yr over 0.1 season
Talent
1.04/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs × 0.83 age decline
BOSBOS Craig Breslow net +$0.0M net +0.0
received +$12.8M+$12.8M ± $40M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 3.5 ± 5 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
receives — most valuable first
Curtis Mead1B/3B·25y·R/R
+$12.5M+$12.5M± $40M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 3.5± 5 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.1/yr over 0.8 season
Talent
0.88/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs × 0.81 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.