RRosternomics
← Trade Database
August 1, 2026

PITNYY

unsettledToo soon to call — players still accruing.
PITPIT Ben Cherington net +$0.0M net +0.0
received −$1.6M−$1.6M ± $14M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 0.6 ± 2 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved PIT's 2026 odds 16.6% → 16.9% (+0.3 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Camilo DovalP·28y·R/R
−$1.4M−$1.4M± $14M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.6± 2 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.8/yr over 2.5 seasons
Talent
0.44/yr blended
Horizon
2.0 control yrs × 0.66 age decline
NYYNYY Brian Cashman net +$0.0M net +0.0
received +$3.2M+$3.2M ± $79M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 2.2 ± 10 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved NYY's 2026 odds 98.7% → 98.7% (+0 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Luis CruzOF·18y·L/R
+$1.8M+$1.8M± $56M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.1± 7 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs × 0.89 age decline
Omar AlfonzoC·22y·L/R
+$1.8M+$1.8M± $56M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.1± 7 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs × 0.89 age decline
Fan verdict — who overpaid?

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →