TOR⇄CHW

TORTOR Ross Atkins net +$4.0M net +0.8

received +$0.0M+$0.0M ± $0M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 0.0 ± 0 expected · 0.0 realized WAR

Playoff odds: this deal moved TOR's 2025 odds 61% → 65% (+4.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗

receives — most valuable first

cash / PTBNL

+$0.0M+$0.0M± $0M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.0± 0 exp WARrealized 0.0

Cash or player to be named — no projection

why ▾hide ▴

CHWCHW Chris Getz net −$4.0M net -0.8

received +$0.8M+$0.8M ± $18M expected surplus · −$4.0M realized received 1.0 ± 2 expected · -0.8 realized WAR

Playoff odds: this deal moved CHW's 2025 odds 0% → 0% (-0.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗

receives — most valuable first

Will RobertsonOF·27y·L/L

+$0.7M+$0.7M± $18M exp surplusrealized −$4.0M 1.0± 2 exp WARrealized -0.8

Prior

#117 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr

Evidence

no MLB track record — leans on pedigree

Talent

0.21/yr blended

Horizon

5.5 control yrs × 0.82 age decline

why ▾hide ▴

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.