Rosternomics
← Trade Database
January 12, 1999

LADCHW

LAD won this trade +$0.0M surplus LAD won this trade +0 WAR
LADLAD Kevin Malone net +$0.0M net +0.0
received +$2.4M+$2.4M ± $25M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 1.3 ± 3 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
receives — most valuable first
Joe SuttonC·24y·R/R
+$2.3M+$2.3M± $25M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.3± 3 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#527 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs
CHWCHW Ron Schueler net +$0.0M net +0.0
received +$0.0M−$0.8M ± $6M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 0.2 ± 1 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
receives — most valuable first
Darren HallP·34y·R/R
+$0.3M−$0.5M± $6M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.2± 1 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.1/yr over 1.5 season
Talent
0.17/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.67 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.