Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
June 18, 1996

DETSDP

DET won this trade +$82.4M surplus DET won this trade +5.7 WAR
DETDET Randy Smith net +$82.4M net +5.7
received +$60.0M+$60.0M ± $44M expected surplus · +$46.4M realized received 10.0 ± 6 expected · 6.3 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved DET's 1996 odds 0% → 0% (-0 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Brad AusmusC·27y·R/R
+$62.4M+$62.4M± $34M exp surplusrealized +$56.8M 9.8± 4 exp WARrealized 7.8
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.5/yr over 1.4 season
Talent
2.46/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs
Russ Spear
+$0.0M+$0.0M± $12M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.2± 2 exp WARrealized 0.0
Unidentified minor-league throw-in — valued at the ~0.2 WAR base rate (most produce nothing)
Andújar CedeñoSS·27y·R/R
−$2.4M−$2.4M± $26M exp surplusrealized −$10.4M 0.0± 3 exp WARrealized -1.5
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.5/yr over 1.9 season
Talent
-0.24/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs
SDPSDP Kevin Towers net −$82.4M net -5.7
received −$7.2M−$7.2M ± $53M expected surplus · −$36.0M realized received 0.0 ± 7 expected · 0.6 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved SDP's 1996 odds 32% → 47% (+15.4 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Chris GomezSS·25y·R/R
−$3.2M−$3.2M± $34M exp surplusrealized −$44.0M 0.0± 4 exp WARrealized -2.0
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -1.3/yr over 1.3 season
Talent
-0.59/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs
John FlahertyC·29y·R/R
−$4.0M−$4.0M± $41M exp surplusrealized +$8.0M 0.0± 5 exp WARrealized 2.6
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.4/yr over 1.1 season
Talent
-0.08/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →