Rosternomics
← Trade Database
June 22, 1989

PITBAL

BAL won this trade +$0.8M surplus PIT won this trade +0.0 WAR
PITPIT Larry Doughty net −$0.8M net +0.0
received −$1.6M−$1.6M ± $24M expected surplus · −$0.8M realized received 0.5 ± 3 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
receives — most valuable first
Mike SmithP·28y·R/R
−$1.8M−$1.8M± $24M exp surplusrealized −$0.8M 0.5± 3 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.2/yr over 0.2 season
Talent
0.15/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs × 0.56 age decline
BALBAL Roland Hemond net +$0.8M net +0.0
received +$0.0M+$0.0M ± $12M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 0.2 ± 2 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
receives — most valuable first
Tony Chance
+$0.3M+$0.3M± $12M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.2± 2 exp WARrealized 0.0
Unidentified minor-league throw-in — valued at the ~0.2 WAR base rate (most produce nothing)

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.