Rosternomics
← Trade Database
July 30, 2021

BOSPIT

BOS won this trade +$3.2M surplus BOS won this trade +0.8 WAR
BOSBOS Chaim Bloom net +$3.2M net +0.8
received −$0.8M−$0.8M ± $12M expected surplus · +$0.8M realized received 0.2 ± 2 expected · 0.4 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved BOS's 2021 odds 55% → 54% (-1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Austin DavisP·28y·L/L
−$1.2M−$1.2M± $12M exp surplusrealized +$0.8M 0.2± 2 exp WARrealized 0.4
Prior
#352 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.1/yr over 1.0 season
Talent
0.07/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs
PITPIT Ben Cherington net −$3.2M net -0.8
received −$3.2M−$3.2M ± $22M expected surplus · −$2.4M realized received 0.1 ± 3 expected · -0.4 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved PIT's 2021 odds 0% → 0% (+0 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Michael Chavis1B/2B·25y·R/R
−$3.2M−$3.2M± $22M exp surplusrealized −$2.4M 0.1± 3 exp WARrealized -0.4
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.3/yr over 0.7 season
Talent
0.03/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.