Rosternomics
← Trade Database
July 25, 2001

OAKCOL

OAK won this trade +$8.8M surplus OAK won this trade +1.3 WAR
OAKOAK Billy Beane net +$8.8M net +1.3
received +$7.2M+$7.2M ± $20M expected surplus · +$7.2M realized received 3.2 ± 2 expected · 1.6 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved OAK's 2001 odds 90% → 92% (+2.4 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Jermaine DyeOF·27y·R/R
+$7.4M+$7.4M± $20M exp surplusrealized +$7.2M 3.2± 2 exp WARrealized 1.6
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 3.3/yr over 2.1 seasons
Talent
2.14/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr
COLCOL Daniel O'Dowd net −$8.8M net -1.3
received +$2.4M+$2.4M ± $46M expected surplus · −$1.6M realized received 2.6 ± 6 expected · 0.3 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved COL's 2001 odds 32% → 26% (-5.9 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Mario EncarnaciónOF·25y·R/R
+$4.2M+$4.2M± $21M exp surplusrealized −$1.6M 1.3± 3 exp WARrealized -0.2
Prior
Composite #90.0 prospect (Baseball America #90 (2000)) — fell off 1 list since, regressed → 0.23/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.23/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Todd BelitzP·25y·L/L
+$0.7M+$0.7M± $29M exp surplusrealized −$1.6M 1.0± 4 exp WARrealized -0.1
Prior
#144 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.0/yr over 0.2 season
Talent
0.19/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
José Ortiz2B·24y·R/R
−$2.9M−$2.9M± $30M exp surplusrealized +$1.6M 0.3± 4 exp WARrealized 0.6
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -4.1/yr over 0.0 season
Talent
0.05/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.