Rosternomics
← Exit to Trade Database
March 30, 2026

SFGDET

unsettledToo soon to call — players still accruing.
🗳 Trade VotingRate every deal of the season — biggest first. Your verdict vs. the model.
73 / 207table view →skip →
Fan verdict — who overpaid?
SFGSFG Buster Posey net +$2.4M net +0.5
received +$5.6M+$5.6M ± $15M expected surplus · +$2.4M realized received 1.6 ± 2 expected · 0.5 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved SFG's 2026 odds 0.7% → 0.8% (+0.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Dylan SmithP·26y·R/R
+$5.8M+$5.8M± $15M exp surplusrealized +$2.4M 1.6± 2 exp WARrealized 0.5
Prior
#74 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.0/yr over 0.2 season
Talent
0.40/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs × 0.76 age decline
DETDET Scott Harris net −$2.4M net -0.5
received +$0.0M+$0.0M ± $0M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 0.0 ± 0 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
receives — most valuable first
cash / PTBNL
+$0.0M+$0.0M± $0M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.0± 0 exp WARrealized 0.0
Cash or player to be named — no projection

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.