Rosternomics
← Exit to Trade Database
July 26, 2026

OAKSTL

unsettledToo soon to call — players still accruing.
🗳 Trade VotingRate every deal of the season — biggest first. Your verdict vs. the model.
97 / 207table view →skip →
Fan verdict — who overpaid?
OAKOAK David Forst net +$2.4M net +0.5
received +$4.0M+$4.0M ± $23M expected surplus · +$2.4M realized received 1.2 ± 3 expected · 0.5 realized WAR
receives — most valuable first
Scott BlewettP·30y·R/R
+$4.2M+$4.2M± $23M exp surplusrealized +$2.4M 1.2± 3 exp WARrealized 0.5
Prior
#56 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.3/yr over 1.2 season
Talent
0.29/yr blended
Horizon
4.4 control yrs
STLSTL Chaim Bloom net −$2.4M net -0.5
received +$0.0M+$0.0M ± $0M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 0.0 ± 0 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
receives — most valuable first
cash / PTBNL
+$0.0M+$0.0M± $0M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.0± 0 exp WARrealized 0.0
Cash or player to be named — no projection

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.