Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
November 24, 2005

MIABOS

MIA won this trade +$322.4M surplus MIA won this trade +12.1 WAR
MIAMIA Larry Beinfest net +$322.4M net +12.1
received +$31.2M+$31.2M ± $115M expected surplus · +$347.2M realized received 9.9 ± 14 expected · 42.3 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved MIA's 2006 odds 7% → 11% (+4.3 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Aníbal Sánchez#40P·22y·R/R
+$14.4M+$14.4M± $58M exp surplusrealized +$70.4M 3.8± 7 exp WARrealized 12.0
Prior
BA #40 prospect (2006) → 0.69/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.69/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Hanley RamírezSS·23y·R/R
+$13.6M+$13.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized +$280.0M 3.7± 7 exp WARrealized 30.5
Prior
BA #30 pedigree (2006) → 0.72/yr
Evidence
recent form -2.7/yr over 0.0 season
Talent
0.68/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Harvey GarcíaP·22y·R/R
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized −$1.6M 1.2± 7 exp WARrealized -0.1
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Jesús DelgadoP·22y·R/R
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized −$1.6M 1.2± 7 exp WARrealized -0.1
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
BOSBOS Theo Epstein net −$322.4M net -12.1
received +$28.0M+$17.6M ± $27M expected surplus · +$24.8M realized received 8.6 ± 3 expected · 30.2 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved BOS's 2006 odds 10% → 6% (-3.8 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Josh BeckettP·26y·R/R
+$42.4M+$42.4M± $18M exp surplusrealized +$68.0M 5.3± 2 exp WARrealized 21.5
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.51/yr
Evidence
recent form 3.7/yr over 2.4 seasons
Talent
2.66/yr blended
Horizon
2.0 control yrs
Guillermo MotaP·33y·R/R
+$4.8M−$5.6M± $14M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.9± 2 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.9/yr over 2.7 seasons
Talent
0.69/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.91 age decline
Mike Lowell3B·32y·R/R
−$19.2M−$19.2M± $14M exp surplusrealized −$43.2M 2.4± 2 exp WARrealized 8.7
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.3/yr over 2.6 seasons
Talent
1.66/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.96 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →