Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
July 29, 2024 · 3-team trade

CHWLADSTL

unsettledToo soon to call — players still accruing.
CHWCHW Chris Getz net +$19.2M net +1.0
received +$4.8M+$4.8M ± $101M expected surplus · +$10.4M realized received 3.4 ± 13 expected · 2.4 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved CHW's 2024 odds 0% → 0% (-0 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Alexander AlbertusSS·20y·R/R
+$2.4M+$2.4M± $62M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.3± 8 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs
Jeral Perez3B·20y·R/R
+$2.4M+$2.4M± $62M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.3± 8 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs
Miguel Vargas3B·25y·R/R
+$0.0M+$0.0M± $49M exp surplusrealized +$10.4M 0.8± 6 exp WARrealized 2.4
Prior
BA #30 pedigree (2023) → 0.47/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.5/yr over 0.6 season
Talent
0.14/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
LADLAD Andrew Friedman net −$15.2M net +0.3
received +$44.0M+$30.4M ± $78M expected surplus · −$4.8M realized received 16.6 ± 10 expected · 2.7 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved LAD's 2024 odds 73% → 83% (+10.3 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Tommy Edman2B·29y·B/R
+$40.8M+$27.2M± $43M exp surplusrealized −$2.4M 14.9± 5 exp WARrealized 2.0
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 3.7/yr over 2.2 seasons
Talent
2.45/yr blended
Horizon
7.0 control yrs × 0.87 age decline
Oliver GonzalezP·18y·R/R
+$2.4M+$2.4M± $62M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.3± 8 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs
Michael KopechP·28y·R/R
+$0.8M+$0.8M± $18M exp surplusrealized −$2.4M 0.4± 2 exp WARrealized 0.7
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.25/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.2/yr over 2.1 seasons
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
2.0 control yrs
STLSTL John Mozeliak net −$4.0M net -1.3
received +$7.2M+$7.2M ± $20M expected surplus · −$6.4M realized received 1.8 ± 2 expected · 0.7 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved STL's 2024 odds 11% → 11% (-0.3 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Tommy PhamOF·36y·R/R
+$6.4M+$6.4M± $12M exp surplusrealized −$1.6M 1.3± 2 exp WARrealized -0.2
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.8/yr over 2.3 seasons
Talent
1.29/yr blended
Horizon
1.0 control yr
Erick FeddeP·31y·R/R
+$0.8M+$0.8M± $16M exp surplusrealized −$4.8M 0.5± 2 exp WARrealized 0.9
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.33/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.3/yr over 1.6 season
Talent
0.31/yr blended
Horizon
2.0 control yrs × 0.75 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →