Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
January 7, 2023

DETPHI

unsettledToo soon to call — players still accruing.
DETDET Scott Harris net +$8.8M net +1.7
received +$16.0M+$16.0M ± $78M expected surplus · +$6.4M realized received 5.4 ± 10 expected · 2.9 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved DET's 2023 odds 3% → 3% (-0.2 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Nick Maton2B/3B·26y·L/R
+$9.6M+$9.6M± $46M exp surplusrealized −$6.4M 2.7± 6 exp WARrealized -1.1
Prior
#203 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.4/yr over 0.5 season
Talent
0.55/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs
Matt VierlingOF·27y·R/R
+$6.4M+$6.4M± $41M exp surplusrealized +$12.8M 1.9± 5 exp WARrealized 4.0
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.7/yr over 0.9 season
Talent
0.40/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs × 0.95 age decline
Donny SandsC/DH·27y·R/R
+$0.0M+$0.0M± $47M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.8± 6 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#243 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -2.2/yr over 0.0 season
Talent
0.17/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs × 0.80 age decline
PHIPHI Dave Dombrowski net −$8.8M net -1.7
received −$1.6M−$1.6M ± $46M expected surplus · −$2.4M realized received 1.0 ± 6 expected · 1.2 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved PHI's 2023 odds 72% → 74% (+1.5 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Gregory SotoP·28y·L/L
+$3.2M+$3.2M± $25M exp surplusrealized −$0.8M 1.0± 3 exp WARrealized 1.3
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.4/yr over 2.3 seasons
Talent
0.33/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs
Kody Clemens1B·27y·L/R
−$4.8M−$4.8M± $38M exp surplusrealized −$1.6M 0.0± 5 exp WARrealized -0.1
Prior
#79 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.6/yr over 0.4 season
Talent
0.00/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs × 0.73 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →